Respect for Tradition

Respect for tradition Cultural differences In order to jimmy the tradition of India, Union Carbide should have done an investigation of Indian cultural values (Robertson and Fadil, 1998). It is possible that firms even within the alike(p) industry develop different values and traditions and the analysis of cultural differences permission to decrease the number of misunderstanding (Donaldson, 1989). One of the most important traits of Indian culture is the fatalism. The Indian population is very spiritual with the notions of karma, fate or destiny.According to them, everything happen for a reason and this way of thinking is operative in decision making in their personal life or within an organisation (Elder, 1966). Fatalism has an impact on two Hofstedes dimensions. part distance is defined as a degree of inequality among populate of the community (Thomas, 2008). Hofstede (2009) found that India is a rustic with a high superpower distance which means that they accept unequal p ower and wealth. Indians think that bulk on the top were destined to be on the top so they accept their decisions due to the fatalism philosophy.However, the power distance in United States is relatively low (Hofstede, 2009). Uncertainty avoidance represents the extent to which mint are forestall by unstructured and unpredictable situations (Thomas, 2008). India has low uncertainty avoidance (Hofstede, 2009). In fact, they prefer few rules as possible and less structures activities. In addition, they are not scared of the unknown and want to take risks. Fatalism emphasises the belief that good deal do not have the control of every situations (Elder, 1966).United States is similarly low in uncertainty avoidance (Hofstede, 2009). According to Hofstede research, both India and the U. S are masculine which means that the society accepts values like assertiveness, performance, supremacy and competition (Thomas, 2008). Individualism/ collectivism is defined as the degree to which people in a country prefer to act as individuals instead than members of groups (Thomas, 2008). India tends to be collectivist while United States are highly individual (Hofstede, 2009).After analysing Hofstede cultural dimensions mingled with India and U. S, it is worth noting that there exist differences between the two countries. Union Carbide would have examined the Indian cultural values forwards doing barter in the country. This could have avoided the Bhopals disastrous. According to Donaldson, it is important for communities to self-define the looking of their business morality and in this case, Union Carbide would have been aware and accepted it in order to respect the Indian tradition.This is called the moral free space. Usually, business communities develop ethical norms which represent a collective viewpoint concerning deals and the remediate behaviour to adopt when making them (Donaldson, 1999). The respect of tradition could be in contrast with core kind values Donaldson considers that companies have to respect traditions of country where they work nevertheless, sometimes these traditions could be in contrast with the core human values. As already mentioned, India is a country with high power distance.For example, in Bhopal, the municipal authorities were against the continued use of the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) show at its original location (Shrivastava, 1987). The plant site was for commercial or light industrial use but not for hazardous industries. However, as UCIL was a powerful accompany in India, the central and state giving medication authorities rejected the citys objection and authorised the company to stay at its location (Bennett et al. 2005). Everybody accepted it and this decision was final.Even if the vertical system is accepted in India, Union Carbide could not have value this tradition because it is in contradiction with the respect of individuals elementary rights. The government did not protect the indiv iduals rights because the plant was most two miles from the Bhopal railway station, local commercial activities and two slum colonies were fixed across the street from the Union Carbide plant (Shrivastava, 1987). So, in order to endure and protect the Indians right, Union Carbide could not have esteem this tradition.Uncertainty avoidance is relatively low in India and it is worth explaining its consequences on the Bhopal plant. The working environment of the plant tolerated negligence and a lack of gum elastic consciousness among workers and managers (Shrivastava, 1987). This behaviour is not only in contrast with the respect of human dignity concept but also with the individual staple rights. In fact, the employees low morale jeopardised the populations health and safety.